The Quality of Anime: Has it Really Declined?

As long as the age of the character isn't driven into the ground, I don't really give it much thought.. For example, I found Darry from Gurren Lagann post-time skip to be very cute. Since a drawing of a fictional character can be any age the creator says so, that's really not a factor, now is it? You can have a tall, busty nine-year-old or a short, petite and young looking 468-year-old. I'm comfortable enough with the fact that I'm not attracted to real children to say if I find a character design aesthetically pleasing or not. Sorry if that bothers people.

Yeah, but Darry is just about the only female character in Gurren Lagann who isn't sexualized at all (at least in-show). Nor does her character design post-time-skip skew much younger than her character's ostensible age. So you could actually make a convincing case that you JUST find her design aesthetically pleasing in a non-sexual way.
 
Yeah, but Darry is just about the only female character in Gurren Lagann who isn't sexualized at all (at least in-show). Nor does her character design post-time-skip skew much younger than her character's ostensible age. So you could actually make a convincing case that you JUST find her design aesthetically pleasing in a non-sexual way.

Susan Sontag would say that to find something aesthetically pleasing you would have to look at it in a non-sexual way. If you look at something with an eye to your own sexual stimulation you aren't looking at it aesthetically. I know, there should be some kind of law where when someone breaks out Sontag the argument is over... we can call it the Undergrad ****** Law. ^^

EDIT: Wait, we can't say ******? It's not a dirty word! It's used for hygiene! It makes things clean! :P
 
Susan Sontag would say that to find something aesthetically pleasing you would have to look at it in a non-sexual way. If you look at something with an eye to your own sexual stimulation you aren't looking at it aesthetically. I know, there should be some kind of law where when someone breaks out Sontag the argument is over... we can call it the Undergrad ****** Law. ^^

EDIT: Wait, we can't say ******? It's not a dirty word! It's used for hygiene! It makes things clean! :P

I learned that the hard way when trying to call Suzaku one in the CG thread in the AS forums :p
 
What was he trying to say, ******? EDIT: Guess so.


I personally think alot of the laws reguarding this subject are too harsh, but that's neither here nor there. All I know is, I'm glad loli art was found to be protected under the first amendment. I mean, we still won't likely get any HERE, but at least it's legal.

And I am reminded of a TV Tropes page that kinda shows a reason I like loli stuff: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AllPaedophilesAreChildMolestors

And, I remembered another show where I don't prefer the loli. Shuffle. Rimu isn't even in my top 3 (Asa, Mayumi, and Kareha)
 
I don't think that really explains why you like loli stuff. It's more you saying you're not a child molester, which is kind of a creepy thing for someone to bring up online because we have no idea if you touch kids or not.

I ment it more to say people can feel that way about children but not actually be criminals. And I've heard of people using loli material as a legal alternative.
 
MICHIKO TO HATCHIN - FIND IT, it's proof anime has life.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Have you and I not been saying this for years? As I recall it was because we had this opinion in common that we became online buds in the first place.

Oh wait, this time you're kidding. :)

Hey, while I wouldn't mind more of it, I know it'd drive some people nuts too. Hell, my girlfriend would be upset of the lack hot anime babes, and I'm not going to start that trouble ;)

I disagree at least with the simplistic way you're making that statement -- I don't think this necessarily reflects on real Japanese sexual morality in the way you seem to mean. We're talking about passive entertainment, not real acts. The connection between the two is not obvious.

True, I was playing it very simple relative to the actual depth of the subject matter. I figured I'd ease into the more complex stuff if need be. Thankfully, you've delivered as follows. Time to kick it like '04 and get our discussion hats on. :D

A part of the appeal of these idols, underage gravure models, etc. is their innocence. Fans of these books may look at these wide-eyed young girls in a sexual manner, but it's a conditioned looking that loses part of its appeal if the object is seen as dirtied by adulthood. (Further reading: here, and here See also: Perfect Blue!) So it's almost the opposite of pedophilia in its classical form -- a real, physical act as part of a passage into adulthood (which coincidentally was usually homosexual anyway). The continued childlike innocence of the object is actually necessary.

Second, just look at the covers of the bestselling gravure books. They depict underage girls who just happen to have developed (often overdeveloped) sexual characteristics (see "12-year-old with F cups" Saaya Irie). True, there are really disturbing dojinshi that depict actual children rather than adolescents, but these are not at all mainstream even in the dojin community and the market for them is as fringe in Japan as it would be in the U.S. -- it's just the more general permissiveness of Japanese society when it comes to sex that allows them to be sold in the open. So the sexual element -- at least in the widely sold books and paraphernalia -- is not pedophiliac. Enjo kosai, too, doesn't belong in an argument about pedophilia as a disorder because high schoolers are fairly sexually well developed. Enjo kosai is more of a social problem than a problem of widespread sexual deviancy.

Oh snap, this is a Colbert-level gotcha moment. Nicely done, Ben!

Yes, while you do have a large piece of the gravure model crap being centered around genetic freaks, and while the majority of enjo kosai is geared around high schoolers and always post-pubescent, the fact is there is a piece of both that connects to girls who look young/their age. Additionally, while it's not necessarily more prevalent in terms of actual offense rates, the cultural permissiveness does allow have it to have a greater and more apparent effect on the media than in the west. In the west, if only because of taboo (if not because of laws which exist almost everywhere but the US,) you'd never even have anything as explicit as Kodomo no Jikan or Chokotto Sister or even Battle Programmer Shiraze in print out of any publisher, let alone the gravure books. I mean, yeah, we came close with Jikan, but relative to Japan, the west just doesn't come to that level of cultural permissiveness, and that alone changes what we get in the media, and it effects perception of what is acceptable in media. That adds to up to - well, you're right Ben, but that doesn't mean it reads as less messed up to the outside world, and doesn't mean that the effect on the media is unusual compared to the west.

To put it another way, the only people in the US who will admit to having an affinity for kids at all are lolicons/shotacons (IE: tied into the relatively permissive otaku culture,) and they still usually qualify that with "it's a 2d-complex thing" in 100pt bold Impact type. In japan, while it's frowned upon, you will get people who own up to it straight up (see: gaijin smash blog.)

Yup. It all depends on how much it bothers you. It actually really ticks me off. However, I think almost all mainstream anime out right now, and some of the otaku / artsy stuff, don't have any real lolicon aspects and it's easy to avoid them.

Like I said, it's all in the angles and story. An exploitative show usually makes it's intent fast and obvious. The stories using kids intelligently/appropriate, well, that's usually pretty obvious too if the directors are worth half a damn.

I mean, I can get some love for Dennou Coil? All kid cast, and story that takes the best Ghibli and Masumune Shirow could offer and smashes them into an awesome burrito.

It might also have something to do with his completely insane story partners. And he's also seemed to lose interest in anime during that time to focus more on manga. (What I'm saying, I suppose, is buy Robot. :))

Yeah, I think I'm behind on that. I'd pay for official english releases of Pochiyama at the Pharmacy and aBE other awesome doujin works too.

Watch Kaiba. And Genius Party. And The Girl Who Leapt Through Time. And Hell Girl. You've got serious genre blinders on if you think there's no visual and narrative creativity going on in anime this year.

You know, I we need to advocate for series like we used on this forum. If I can get Chad to watch Koi Kaze, I'm sure a series that isn't completely morally broken and visually/narratively exciting should be a synch.
 

And pretty much the whole EU, and a lot of other countries. The US and Japan are very, very unusual for allowing even drawings of underage content, and it's only allowed in the US because we basically don't discriminate between visual art and speech (most of the time,) resulting in it being very hard if not impossible to pass an anti-pedo-art law without violating the constitution, or conversely, it'd take a constitutional amendment. Of course, what with the Simpsons' Movie
having Bart's junk in it
That would even make a blanket constitutional amendment banning explicit depictions of fictional minors something that'd put how many millions in violation of the law? Further still it still doesn't cover "I wrote she's 18, she only looks like a baby" and result in further obscenity trials. And well that rigmarole, this is why attempts to make it illegal in the US don't stick. We have some of the most liberal laws in the world on it, and if really, it's unlikely that'll change anytime soon unless you could stack the Supreme Court with justices that'd be willing to ignore several precedent-setting cases.

B-b-b-b-b-back on topic of quality, I will say that lolicon/shota material, does at the very least dilute the anime pool with some stuff that'll turn off your average westerner, and that even some of the clean titles will put off a person if only because of those little cultural differences in regards to openness about the topic. I mean, as clean as a title like, say, Azumanga is, people like Kimura-sensei would give the uninitiated viewer pause. Extend that further, and well, it doesn't matter how good a story like Gunslinger Girl or Ichigo Mashimaro is, it's gonna make certain people glitch out cause it has kids depicted in a fashion not considered kosher by the west (shoot, the innocent bath scene in Totoro makes some folks pissed.) As such, even when it's not lolicon/shotacon-oriented, it's going to create a very annoying distraction to the discourse at points. Granted, the fact that Sailor Moon was 14 while Tuxedo Mask was 21 raises eyebrows. You don't even have to go recent and moe-like to get into trouble on this and take would should a debate about a show and turn it into a debate of it's morals even though that's obviously not the focus of the work.

Oh, and that's where the dilution argument falls apart too. Yaoi dilutes the pool with stuff some people would whine about. Ditto for yuri, harems, hyper-violence, high school romance, rebellious/obnoxious kids (India banned Shin Chan!), occult themes, religious themes, sports manga, shonen battlers, etc. Ones own taste can't keep something out of the medium, at least in a free society, and as long as it doesn't impinge upon someone else's rights. At most, it can result in it getting represented in the medium.

It also distracts from broader topics, like over all quality of anime in a given era. I mean, I'd be a liar if I said animation quality is was not way up. Even stupid shows usually have pretty good if not great compositing, and the amount of totally wack 3D is disappearing as more animation students with talent and right training come into the industry and while computer power becomes cheap and massive (Gonzo cutting back the number series per year should also help - oh no he didn't!) Add to that the niche studios cranking out amazing and unique content, and I have to say that even though there is some garbage in the mix, it's certainly more interesting than the pre-boom era where stuff like Windy Tales and Dennou Coil would probably never turn up, ever.

In fact, I'd gripe way more about the great shows that sit in licensing hell (where is Mind Game!?!?!!!!?1one) than the content that you wouldn't even watch anyway.
 
Clearly, the only solution is to not only kick the lolicon aspect out of anime, but to really kick the objectification of women in anime out. All character design should be handled by yoshitoshi ABe, as we know from Haibane and NieA he's great at drawing of age characters with an adult build, frumpy clothes, and nothing more than, oh, B-cups. If there is to be a young girl featured in an anime, it may only be in a Ghibli picture, as we all know all Ghibli heroines are positive role models of assertive young women.

For what its worth, there's one girl in my anime club who keeps going on about how "LAIN IS HAWT!1!1!1!!!11!"

She also says that Lewis Carrol and the Broken Neck Lady from Fatal Frame are HAWT!1!1!1!!!11!, so yeah.
 
I personally think alot of the laws reguarding this subject are too harsh, but that's neither here nor there. All I know is, I'm glad loli art was found to be protected under the first amendment. I mean, we still won't likely get any HERE, but at least it's legal.

And I am reminded of a TV Tropes page that kinda shows a reason I like loli stuff: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AllPaedophilesAreChildMolestors

And, I remembered another show where I don't prefer the loli. Shuffle. Rimu isn't even in my top 3 (Asa, Mayumi, and Kareha)

Wow, we're gonna be like best friends since I agree with everything you're saying here (I freakin' hated Rimu and I don't like that witch from Rosario+Vampire either).

As for the loli issue, I don't think that it is a huge ultra-mainstream problem that needs to be gotten rid of. I mean, let's face it, it's Japanese anime. Is loli really the most controversial thing that's ever been put out? I can think of that certain episode of Gundam SEED that had an even bigger outcry, in Japan no less, than anything loli related.

HG Revolution said:
For what its worth, there's one girl in my anime club who keeps going on about how "LAIN IS HAWT!1!1!1!!!11!"

She also says that Lewis Carrol and the Broken Neck Lady from Fatal Frame are HAWT!1!1!1!!!11!, so yeah.
But Lain is HAWT!1!!1!!!11! :p (I'm sorry but reading that was way too funny) and really? The broken neck lady from Fatal Frame? Seriously?

Karl Olsen said:
In fact, I'd gripe way more about the great shows that sit in licensing hell (where is Mind Game!?!?!!!!?1one) than the content that you wouldn't even watch anyway.
And Kaiba. That really needs to be here too for sheer mind-screwery
 
Mind Game made me cry. Not because it's sad, but because i think half my brain died durring that weird dance scene.

Damn, I want a US DVD release...
 
I mean, I can get some love for Dennou Coil? All kid cast, and story that takes the best Ghibli and Masumune Shirow could offer and smashes them into an awesome burrito.
In fact, I'd gripe way more about the great shows that sit in licensing hell (where is Mind Game!?!?!!!!?1one) than the content that you wouldn't even watch anyway.
Y'know, you're right. Denno Coil, Windy Tales, Kemonozume, Kaiba, etc - example after example haven't even been licensed, some having sat around in oblivion for years. Come to think of it, were they even that popular amongst the fansub community or in Japan? I know they each had their circle of avid fans, but they never seemed to garner the attention of more typical fare. So even if they were licensed, who'd notice? They'd need exposure, but what networks would air them or give them a fair time slot? And then, who'd tune in?

Am I being too pessimistic? :sweat:

She also says that Lewis Carrol and the Broken Neck Lady from Fatal Frame are HAWT!1!1!1!!!11!, so yeah.
That's about the last way I'd have expected Lewis Carroll to be brought up in this thread, for some reason or another.

--Romey
 
In a nutshell, I don't think anime in the last decade has declined as much as there's more of a saturation of the market. At the turn of the decade, pretty much the only notable anime was airing on Toonami (really, they were IT, with DBZ/DB, Sailor Moon, Tenchi Muyo OVA/2 TV series, Blue Submarine no. 6, Gundam Wing/08th MS Team/0080/MSG, Outlaw Star, Big O, and they almost landed Cowboy Bebop to boot and actually tested an edited episode). Other than that, there were only a few OVAs aside along with Evangelion and Nadesico on the racks.

Now look where the industry is in the United States today. Big difference from the turn of the decade, don't you think? Except that pretty much all the anime is on the DVD racks and virtually nothing is on TV.
 
Y'know, you're right. Denno Coil, Windy Tales, Kemonozume, Kaiba, etc - example after example haven't even been licensed, some having sat around in oblivion for years. Come to think of it, were they even that popular amongst the fansub community or in Japan? I know they each had their circle of avid fans, but they never seemed to garner the attention of more typical fare. So even if they were licensed, who'd notice? They'd need exposure, but what networks would air them or give them a fair time slot?

I'm a little more optimistic, in that I think given a good release in the US, buzz in the enthusiast community would propel these titles to at least modest success. Well, maybe not Kaiba or Windy Tales, but certainly Kemonozume and Denno Coil. In terms of licensor, they are quintessential late-era Geneon shows... which perhaps explains a lot and rather supports your perspective rather than mine.
 
I'm a little more optimistic, in that I think given a good release in the US, buzz in the enthusiast community would propel these titles to at least modest success. Well, maybe not Kaiba or Windy Tales, but certainly Kemonozume and Denno Coil.
"Given a good release" is certainly the essential qualifier, there. :D

In some alternate universe, I'm sure Kemonozume would be a runaway late-night (and not early morning) hit in that universe's version of AS or Ani-Monday, and Denno Coil would receive at least as much fanfare as any Ghibli feature even without being broadcast first. I'm not foreseeing that in our current reality, even with some good enthusiast buzz. Hey, maybe it could happen, but not anytime soon.

In terms of licensor, they are quintessential late-era Geneon shows... which perhaps explains a lot and rather supports your perspective rather than mine.
Heh, true, innit? :p

:densuke: :satchii:
--Romey
 
I think this just boils down to the fact that one day, Ben, Romey and I need to start an anime localization company in Burbank, run out of Ben's guest house. We can ask John O'Donnell and Jerry Beck for tips on what to do and not do. :anime:
 
B-b-b-b-b-back on topic of quality, I will say that lolicon/shota material, does at the very least dilute the anime pool with some stuff that'll turn off your average westerner, and that even some of the clean titles will put off a person if only because of those little cultural differences in regards to openness about the topic. I mean, as clean as a title like, say, Azumanga is, people like Kimura-sensei would give the uninitiated viewer pause. Extend that further, and well, it doesn't matter how good a story like Gunslinger Girl or Ichigo Mashimaro is, it's gonna make certain people glitch out cause it has kids depicted in a fashion not considered kosher by the west (shoot, the innocent bath scene in Totoro makes some folks pissed.) As such, even when it's not lolicon/shotacon-oriented, it's going to create a very annoying distraction to the discourse at points. Granted, the fact that Sailor Moon was 14 while Tuxedo Mask was 21 raises eyebrows. You don't even have to go recent and moe-like to get into trouble on this and take would should a debate about a show and turn it into a debate of it's morals even though that's obviously not the focus of the work.
I'm in full agreement with your overall points, especially the one here about these various issues not being the actual point of the shows that contain them. The Gunslinger Girl example makes me think, because it disturbs me but I had always figured that this was the point. I wouldn't think that the way in which the girls are used would be acceptable much of anywhere. I figured we that we weren't supposed to be comfortable with the situation, we're supposed to feel sorry for the girls and bear witness to the shreds of humanity that they still cling to.

Shoot, you know, I think the age difference between Sailor Moon and Tuxedo Mask actually got brought up between me and my sister way back. I think we decided it was a bit weird. I think what helped it though is that the romance was mostly clean--SM was for young girls, after all. In contrast, the sort of "otaku" shows we've all talked about earlier would probably take the same situation and introduce a decent share of awkward situations that would be more likely to offend Western viewers. I think tact goes a long way when it comes to whether such issues are found offensive or not. If there were vocal protests against Sailor Moon back when it was on television, then I missed the boat.

I think the above point stands, though I should add that maybe the acceptance of SM would have been different if the relationship between Uranus and Neptune hadn't been edited.
 

Spotlight

Staff online

Who's on Discord?

Latest profile posts

Vuxovich SpecialColorfull Vuxovich wrote on SpecialColorfull's profile.
Will you please post ''「クロノア2」で哀しみの王の声を担当したのは誰ですか?'' on Hideo Yoshizawa's X profile?
Vuxovich PinkieLopBun Vuxovich wrote on PinkieLopBun's profile.
Are you an expert on Japanese voice acting? If your are, please check this out!
Who's the expert on Japanese voice actors here? I want to solve this problem.

Here's a fun article I wrote on why Ruby and Jade from Sofia The First are good characters.

Featured Posts

Back
Top