gtracer72
All hail Starscream!!
I think that the teenager should be charged in Virginia. If convicted in Maryland, he would only get life. As for the father, I think it was a good call to charge him in Maryland.
Originally posted by The Guard
"Malvo tried to escape from an interrogation room sometime after his capture by going through a panel in the ceiling, but investigators were able to pull him back down"
I hope he pleads "innocent". It would be so much sweeter.
Originally posted by BrendaBat
I heard a really hypocritical quote about John Mohammed on the news a few days ago. It said: "He did it because he was angry about all the bad press and discrimination Muslims in the U.S. have recieved since 9/11/2001"
Does he really think he's helping his fellow Muslims by going on a killing spree and then saying "I represent Islam"!?
Originally posted by gtracer72
Great. The one thing good about VA is that capital punishment can be charged against people under 18. My comments came true.
Originally posted by TimTwoFace
Are you serious? Wow, I never knew that. Doesn't that go against the young offender's act, though?
-Tim
If a person commits any felony after March 7, 1994 and:
If the person has one previous "violent" or "serious" felony conviction (which includes burglary of an unoccupied dwelling), he or she is sentenced to twice the term prescribed by law for each new felony (and must serve at least 80% of the sentence).
If the person has two previous violent or serious felony convictions, he or she is sentenced to a life sentence with the possibility of parole. The minimum term of the life sentence is calculated as the greater of the following:
a. Three times the term otherwise provided
b. 25 years
c. The term determined by the court pursuant to other applicable sentencing provisions of existing law.
The age is 18, and yeah, it should definitely be changed. It's probably beneficial for the majority of cases, but there are so many that are heinous. There's one off the top of my head where an 11 y/o taunted policement to just "try and touch him" for beating a 2 y/o, because he was protected by th YOA.Originally posted by TimTwoFace
Oh, I thought that the Young Offender's Act existed in the US, too. OK, well, in Canada, anyone under the age of 19 (unless the crime is incredibly heinous) is not allowed to be tried in adult court, cannot be shown on TV, and it all wipes clean at 19. I personally think it's a joke. Too many teens kill and knowingly kill these days, and they get off scott free.
Oh yeah, and there's no capital punishment in Canada, either. That ended a couple decades ago.
-Tim
Oh, I thought that the Young Offender's Act existed in the US, too. OK, well, in Canada, anyone under the age of 19 (unless the crime is incredibly heinous) is not allowed to be tried in adult court, cannot be shown on TV, and it all wipes clean at 19. I personally think it's a joke. Too many teens kill and knowingly kill these days, and they get off scott free.
Oh yeah, and there's no capital punishment in Canada, either. That ended a couple decades ago.
Originally posted by BrendaBat
I heard a really hypocritical quote about John Mohammed on the news a few days ago. It said: "He did it because he was angry about all the bad press and discrimination Muslims in the U.S. have recieved since 9/11/2001"
Does he really think he's helping his fellow Muslims by going on a killing spree and then saying "I represent Islam"!?