Cyporiean
lvl 99 Otaku
Yeah. It seemed like HD-DVD would of been the winning format but....
Oh well.
with the lesser sales every week?
Yeah. It seemed like HD-DVD would of been the winning format but....
Oh well.
I really think it's a shame for the industry that HD-DVD didn't win, simply because of the name. HD-DVD easily connotes its a high-definition DVD, but you think Joe Consumer knows what a Blu-Ray disc is other than it costs double what the same movie does on DVD without any extra features? A format needs grandmas to buy it as well as techies in order for it to become mainstream, and I don't seem it happening with this one.
I hvae to disagree about the name HD-DVD. TOO many people think HD-DVD just means it is a higher quality disc that plays on any DVD. At least with Blu-Ray you know it is different.
Hey, look at that, you abbreviated Microsoft as MS, then replaced the S with a dollar sign, most probably to make a point about your feelings toward Microsoft and how they may have occasionally strayed from the purer path in the pursuit of money, the thing that every business in existence ever is, by definition, pursuing. You're a clever one, you sly devil you.
I've never met anybody who thought that about HD-DVDs; I have met people who didn't know what the hell a Blu-Ray was or thought they just worked in PS3s. Neither is good for Sony.
I've seen tons of people at stores returning HD-DVDs saying they did not know they needed a specific player to play it since it said DVD on it. Some of the guys at my local BB have it happen to them all the time. When they would talk about Blu-Ray, people would always ask why they needed to buy another player for BR, but not HD-DVD, not knowing it was NOT DVD.
Not that it wasn't a problem for HD-DVD, but I would surmise that these are the same people who wanted to know why there were black bars on their screen and wanted to know what was wrong with the DVD or their player.I've seen tons of people at stores returning HD-DVDs saying they did not know they needed a specific player to play it since it said DVD on it. Some of the guys at my local BB have it happen to them all the time. When they would talk about Blu-Ray, people would always ask why they needed to buy another player for BR, but not HD-DVD, not knowing it was NOT DVD.
Hey common, Im guilty of doing that as well from time to time. Others do it too.Hey, look at that, you abbreviated Microsoft as MS, then replaced the S with a dollar sign, most probably to make a point about your feelings toward Microsoft and how they may have occasionally strayed from the purer path in the pursuit of money, the thing that every business in existence ever is, by definition, pursuing. You're a clever one, you sly devil you.
...
*sigh*

I don't understand why people are upset that HD-DVD lost. It was a smaller capacity format that was inferior to the competition. Not everything has to do with movies, data storage is a huge part of it as well. 50Gb is data on one disc vs 30Gb, no contest.
I hvae to disagree about the name HD-DVD. TOO many people think HD-DVD just means it is a higher quality disc that plays on any DVD. At least with Blu-Ray you know it is different.
Not that it wasn't a problem for HD-DVD, but I would surmise that these are the same people who wanted to know why there were black bars on their screen and wanted to know what was wrong with the DVD or their player.
Because it's in a section labeled high definition right next Blu ray, the packaging is different and while I don't own any, there has got to be something on the back of the HD-DVD that says it's different. I have no sympathy for the uninformed consumer. If your VCR flashed 12:00, you have no business trying to buy DVDs without asking questions first.That's not really fair. I mean, the letters DVD are right in the name. Why would anyone think that a DVD wouldn't play on a DVD player?