I did not like what President Bush said upon receiving the news; democracy is not for everyone -- it doesn't work, period, for certain people with certain beliefs. We've tried to install that in Iraq and Afghanistan, but many of the people don't like it -- they would prefer a theocracy. It's not the Western ideal, but it's what they want as the people.
I don't want to get into this too deep since it involves politics too much, but I do have to say that this idea that democracy isn't for everybody never sits well.
True, democracy in the sense that we know it in the US may not be right for everybody, but the general, basic idea of a democracy - that the people should have a say in how their lives are run - is not just a Western ideal, but a basic human right.
Now, it may very well be that through a result of a democracy - tailored for the needs and climate of the country, of course - the people end up with laws and state sponsored relgion and all the things that can come from a theocracy - but at that point, iideally, it's by the people's will that such laws are enacted and not by the will of whatever the head of the official religion, no matter how corrupt, decides is right.
A western style democracy that attempts to purge many religious and cultural aspects from society isn't right for everybody (I think that was a big mistake we made with Japan, personally) but in general, I don't know anybody that would say no to having a say in how THEIR OWN LIVES are run.
Of course, how loose or tight of a democracy is established, as well as how we go about getting a democracy established (and whether it's even our job in the first place) is all valid heated debate material. But again, I don't really think it's a huge stretch to say that the idea of people having a say in their government isn't for everyone. Maybe I'm wrong - maybe I have democracy so ingrained into me that I can't think of it as anything but a universally good principal.