I don't know. I've watched this movie twice, and about the best thing that I can say about the movie is that it's ok. It's definitely not bad. All of the voice actors did a nice job. Christina Hendricks probably gave the best performance of all as Lois Lane. And speaking of Lois, probably my favorite part of the movie was Super Lois.
Really the only complaint that I have about the movie itself is that there wasn't a very good explanation for who some of the characters were. You have to understand that I know absolutely nothing of this movie's source material. So I know absolutely nothing about this "Samson" character or this "Dr. Leo Quintum" (whom by the way was voiced very nicely by Alexis Denisof). So that's the problem that I'm having with this movie. Do I need to be an expert on the source material to truly understand these characters?
I had similar sentiments. On the one hand, I thought the premise of this movie was phenomenal and to the movie's credit, it more than delivered with Superman, Lois, and Lex's characterizations during the film. So in that sense, it was a great film. I loved seeing Clark come to terms with his condition and do all the great things I would expect from Superman as he prepares for his impending death. Watching Lex slowly reform over the course of the movie was a real treat as well. And the voice actors were truly spectacular - I hope they reprise their roles in future movies/tv shows.
Yet all the extraneous characters left me in the dark. I wondered if I was supposed to know who these people were beforehand, as if I was missing out because I wasn't intimately familiar with who they were. Now sure, I was able to pick up on the basic things from the context like Ed mentioned (like Atlas and Samson were strong men from future who like to mess with time, Quintum's a crazy smart scientist, etc.), but I still felt I wasn't able to experience the fully story because I had to fill in the gaps every 10 minutes for all these new and unexplained characters with no help from the movie. This really bugged me with Solaris - to my knowledge, he/it was never mentioned in the movie prior to his appearance, but he comes out of left field, apparently forms an off-screen partnership with Luthor, and apparently all the characters in the film know that Solaris is the bad guy blocking the yellow sun even though he's never been mentioned before and the viewers have no reason to suspect his involvement based on the movie thus far. Given his importance to the film's plot, I would have liked a little more than for me to assume on my own that he's a mechanical, artificial sun.
Now, none of this ruined the movie for me by any means, but in my mind, this caused what should have been a great movie to just be above average. An enjoyable movie with a great premise, but nothing spectacular.
However, I will accept that maybe I'm not the expected audience since I have not read the comic. My experience with Superman is strictly limited to live action and animation, so I'm not readily familiar with the more obscure characters. So I will concede that some of my displeasure with the film may just be because I'm not the target audience.
Last edited by a moderator:



clumsy Kent! his keys hiding spot is pretty good
super powers are a cool birthday present even better then alien flower bouquet! from the earths core to outer space. poor evil lizard guy...
they broke the moon!! electric chair is no match for superpowered lemonade! robot 7 noooo! Solaris goes down but right away theres still more evil afoot. Metropolis can't catch a break
I think I'll make the jump from renting to buying which will be a first 