WBD Acquisition Thread

I think Georgia needs to get in there and sue too. Ted Turner built up Atlanta and helped start what became a strong media industry that the state has latched on to. A merged company the man who ran a Studio in name only for 20 years will hurt that in many ways, including destroying the Atlanta part of the company. There will be one less company due to the merger, less movies and TV will be made and less work will be around. Time for Georgia to step up too.

Some staffers in the Justice Department’s antitrust division believe the statement was designed to make it harder for state attorneys general to challenge the deal in court, the people said. The investigative staff didn’t participate in writing the statement, the people said."
The whole point is to rush it. The goal would be to get it through quicky, SkyDance man can get things done quickly to make it hard to unbundle before a challenge is put up. Nexstar was doing that but the judge was just quick enough to slam the brakes, and because Nexstar was kind of caught off guard by how quick their deal was approved. That also means this will be very shoddy and could be challenged pretty well. The government and man would have to hard proof that they aren't going against any laws that exist.

DirectTV or some other major pay TV company or many of them need to get a suit in too. Having the Discovery Channels and Viacom channels together would mean that pay TV operators could end up having to pay a higher fee for the suite of more channels. It would be like DirectTV rightfully said about Nexstar if they are allowed to own 4 channels in Denver Nexstar would be able exhort more money. Same here, and this would also hurt smaller operators like AMC Networks, Versant, etc.


On Friday, the department issued a long, supportive public statement about the merger, saying it would likely be good for competition, especially in the market for streaming video, in which Netflix and Amazon are major players. The statement also said the studio and distribution market has “extensive” competition that would probably continue even after Paramount acquires Warner.
The streaming argument is the used a lot by Paramount SkyDance as a good misdirect. Paramount Plus is really a non-entity to people as a streamer. It's behind Apple TV (streaming) the only things it has to support is CBS next day streaming, NFL , and Yellowstone man who is leaving a few years (lol). If these two were just streaming companies (no TV, no major studios ,etc.) it would be actually fine if they merged. The other parts of the companies are the main sticking points.

Apparently, Trump's DOJ senior leadership did a pre-emptive overrule on the staff investigators scrutinizing Ellison's WarnerDiscovery pursuit. They said the incurred debt mountain wouldn't be a good reason to raise legal challenge and wanted to make things hard for the coalition of 10 state AGs to bring cases:
This happened with FCC/DOJ with Nexstar they approved the deal and didn't go through normal process and that's one aspect of why it's stalled in court now.
 
I think Georgia needs to get in there and sue too. Ted Turner built up Atlanta and helped start what became a strong media industry that the state has latched on to. A merged company the man who ran a Studio in name only for 20 years will hurt that in many ways, including destroying the Atlanta part of the company. There will be one less company due to the merger, less movies and TV will be made and less work will be around. Time for Georgia to step up too.


The whole point is to rush it. The goal would be to get it through quicky, SkyDance man can get things done quickly to make it hard to unbundle before a challenge is put up. Nexstar was doing that but the judge was just quick enough to slam the brakes, and because Nexstar was kind of caught off guard by how quick their deal was approved. That also means this will be very shoddy and could be challenged pretty well. The government and man would have to hard proof that they aren't going against any laws that exist.

DirectTV or some other major pay TV company or many of them need to get a suit in too. Having the Discovery Channels and Viacom channels together would mean that pay TV operators could end up having to pay a higher fee for the suite of more channels. It would be like DirectTV rightfully said about Nexstar if they are allowed to own 4 channels in Denver Nexstar would be able exhort more money. Same here, and this would also hurt smaller operators like AMC Networks, Versant, etc.



The streaming argument is the used a lot by Paramount SkyDance as a good misdirect. Paramount Plus is really a non-entity to people as a streamer. It's behind Apple TV (streaming) the only things it has to support is CBS next day streaming, NFL , and Yellowstone man who is leaving a few years (lol). If these two were just streaming companies (no TV, no major studios ,etc.) it would be actually fine if they merged. The other parts of the companies are the main sticking points.


This happened with FCC/DOJ with Nexstar they approved the deal and didn't go through normal process and that's one aspect of why it's stalled in court now.
Speaking of Atlanta, Skydance's already rushing with early integration meetings for the WarnerDiscovery pursuit at CNN's NYC Hudson Yards base & Atlanta's Techwood Campus bureau (the Turner operation buildings):

"The long-awaited CNN–CBS News merger is officially underway: I’m told CBS News president Tom Cibrowski and other news and sports execs visited Hudson Yards last week and traveled to the Atlanta bureau today. As I reported in March, CNN’s real estate is likely to serve as the base of operations for both networks after the merger."


Not to mention, they also did this for Paramount Global with Jeff Shell leading Ellison's Skydance lieutenants around CBS News numerous times before the Redstone sale was offically done.

Considering the Trump admin wants Larry & David to give them favorable political coverage for the midterms and future elections, rushing things is the intention to make that timeline.

Compared with other suitors, Skydance never had material benefit for Paramount Global at the end of the day.

The National Amusements sale just let the Redstones excessively cash out with $2B of proceeds, their NYC apartments later bought out by Larry, covering their private jet lease, and $200M to pay for lawyers in lawsuits from non-Redstone investors who got stuck with the short end of the stick.
 
Last edited:
Why aren’t they suing now? Integration and consolidation might be underway
 
Not a done deal yet but the idea about it being the shortest fast tracked merger in corporate history is really surprising. Closing the deal before midterms in order to have major influence when in fact the whole country sees our current leaders unpopular.

This is going to sink both studios.
 
Not a done deal yet but the idea about it being the shortest fast tracked merger in corporate history is really surprising. Closing the deal before midterms in order to have major influence when in fact the whole country sees our current leaders unpopular.

This is going to sink both studios.
yeah, not to mention, after 2028, the new president will find David Ellison liable for this like what happened with live nation
 
yeah, not to mention, after 2028, the new president will find David Ellison liable for this like what happened with live nation
It’s like they want their personal views to take over the world where all bow down to one king.
 
Judging from the vibes of this page, I'm guessing there's nothing than can halt the merger now?
 
Why aren’t they suing now? Integration and consolidation might be underway
The merger CANNOT BE FINALIZED until regulators in other countries give the final approval.

State attorney generals are still working and prepare to sue when merger is going to close, so you cannot sue when regulators in other countries are still under review, otherwise it make legal system messy, also Netflix or other companies could step in to thwart the merger. However, they will definitely sue now if Ellison break the antitrust laws like negotiate that is related to WBD assets like Ellison did with South Park last year.

If Ellison rushed to integrate and consolidate quickly, so Ellison would be forced to reverse everything when court order to block the merger.

After all, the court CAN BLOCK AND REVERSE the merger, so Ellison wouldn't get away nor make an excuse in the court.

Judging from the vibes of this page, I'm guessing there's nothing than can halt the merger now?
No, you should have a patience.

The DOJ approval of Paramount-WBD is nothing when it is not cleared by multiple regulators in other countries.

Last resort, the court can block the merger.
 
After the recent Stop Killing Games debate being discussed at the European Commission was lackluster compared to the debate within the European Parliament (because they've complied to the ESA's needs + bribery) , could this give Ellison the chance to bribe the former entity of the European Union that's investigating Paramount's acquisition of WBD with a ton of money in his pocket, or will the Commission refuse to give in to Ellison's demand and eventually pan the merger with a huge rejection stamp?
 
After the recent Stop Killing Games debate being discussed at the European Commission was lackluster compared to the debate within the European Parliament (because they've complied to the ESA's needs + bribery) , could this give Ellison the chance to bribe the former entity of the European Union that's investigating Paramount's acquisition of WBD with a ton of money in his pocket, or will the Commission refuse to give in to Ellison's demand and eventually pan the merger with a huge rejection stamp?
Who knows? It could be the latter for all I know. I'm not gonna assume that the Ellison family and Paramount, a Skydance Corporation will automatically win.

I just don't see the European Commission approving the merger unless it requires some significant remedies on PSKY's end: for instance, preventing a monopoly on linear pay-TV channels aimed at kids; or doing something about SkyShowtime, since it would be weird if 50% of that streaming service was owned by the same company that would also own the HBO Max service already available in almost all of SkyShowtime's markets post-merger.
 
Last edited:
Paramount May Drop Joint Venture to Secure EU Merger Approval

PSKY might end their joint venture with Universal. But there is still the Middle Eastern money that might flag the merger in the EU.
So this merger might potentially require both the end of United International Pictures (the well-established longtime global distributor of Paramount Pictures and Universal Pictures movies in many countries around the world, including in Denmark among others) and significant changes to SkyShowtime (which is the main way to watch Paramount+ stuff in multiple European countries, including Denmark) in order to get closer to securing EU approval.
 
So this merger might potentially require both the end of United International Pictures (the well-established longtime global distributor of Paramount Pictures and Universal Pictures movies in many countries around the world, including in Denmark among others) and significant changes to SkyShowtime (which is the main way to watch Paramount+ stuff in multiple European countries, including Denmark) in order to get closer to securing EU approval.
I doubt Universal nor Comcast will take this lightly.

EDIT: Now I’m worried Bonta won’t sue.
 
Last edited:
I doubt Universal nor Comcast will take this lightly.

EDIT: Now I’m worried Bonta won’t sue.

If California won't so other state and customers will do it. Look at you, Georgia (Chris Carr isn't MAGA).

If PSKY-WBD merger turn out to be failure that is akin to Time Warner-AOL, so Ellison would be forced out and both gets split off with possibility of more fragmented assets. It is hot mess.

Also failed merger would force the corporations to rethink about future M&A, so that why we didn't see hotel M&A recently and possibly neither is grocery.

It is indeed true that PSKY-WBD would benefit Trump in short term but he and his family would be screwed up eventually and stain on his legacy, especially if M&A end up as failure and angry movie fans would blame on him for approve the merger at first place.
 
I doubt Universal nor Comcast will take this lightly.

EDIT: Now I’m worried Bonta won’t sue.

I'm not a prophet and can't see the future, but I've been told Rob Bonta is up for re-election and, viewing this from a cynical perspective I normally don't subscribe to, suing to stop the single most despised merger in recent memory would all but ensure his re-election chances

also, normal people in these positions tend to be more private about this stuff, though you'd be forgiven if you think everything about the process should be known considering that's what Ellison tried to set a precedent for

edit: take this with a grain of salt as well, but I've also been told this meeting happened the same day the DOJ jammed approval through without everyone's oversight and mr. bonta tweeted his latest callout tweet mere hours after that approval made headlines
 
Last edited:
A little more on Skydance's early integration meetings at NYC's Hudson Yards & Atlanta's Techwood campus:

"A few weeks ago, as CBS News and CNN inched closer to a corporate marriage, top executives from the two news organizations and their parent companies convened for an introductory meeting. Representing CBS News were Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss and President Tom Cibrowski. CNN’s delegation included chief executive Mark Thompson, chief operating officer Alex MacCallum, and Executive Editor Virginia Moseley.

Executives from the companies’ respective parent organizations also attended, including Paramount chief operating officer Andy Gordon.

During the meeting, which has not been previously reported, Status has learned that CNN executives walked Paramount and CBS News leaders through the network’s strategy. MacCallum outlined CNN’s digital ambitions, including its recently launched streaming product and online subscription offering. Moseley, meanwhile, discussed how CNN distributes its journalism across its many platforms, from television to its highly trafficked website and digital properties.

The meetings, of course, are constrained by gun-jumping rules, meaning Paramount cannot begin managing CNN before it formally acquires the asset. But executives at the Ellison-led company are entitled to gain a better understanding of the businesses they are preparing to purchase before the transaction closes.

Paramount, which will emerge from the deal with a massive debt load, will also face significant pressure to realize synergies as quickly. Translation: Gordon & Co. will be hunting for cuts.

The first targets are likely to be back-office functions. CNN and CBS News can draw on the same shared infrastructure for human resources, legal affairs, communications, marketing, and other such services. Those are the easiest efficiencies to achieve and will be the least messy, though they’re still likely to generate plenty of headlines.

Things get much trickier after that. CBS News operates with a unionized workforce, while CNN does not. Media insiders I spoke with are not entirely sure how Paramount intends to navigate that reality.

Merger discussions between the two news organizations have famously been held before, and labor issues have always been among the biggest obstacles. Perhaps CBS News could license content from CNN, or vice versa.

But one industry insider warned that if Paramount attempts to brazenly sidestep union rules, it will almost certainly face stiff resistance. We’ll have to wait and see whether the company ultimately finds a creative solution, but it’s difficult to imagine Ellison will bite the bullet and allow CNN to become a union shop."


"Earlier this week, Tom Cibrowski, the president and executive editor of CBS News and unwitting Sancho Panza of the network’s Bari Weiss era, found himself in a delegation of Paramount technical staff on a tour of Warner Bros. Discovery’s Techwood Campus—the 30-acre production complex in Midtown Atlanta that serves, among other things, as the global headquarters for CNN. Days earlier, Tom also joined this team on a tour of the network’s true executive headquarters at Hudson Yards, about a mile and a half down 10th Avenue from the CBS Broadcast Center.

The visits, I’m told, gave the Paramount folks an opportunity to preview the control rooms, production studios, and other facilities they will inherit once David Ellison secures his merger of the two companies, barring interference from objecting Democratic state attorneys general.

For the journalists concerned, news of these visits offered the most tangible sign yet that the integration of their two storied news networks was already underway. “I can’t believe it’s actually happening,” one CNN reporter texted me. Indeed, it’s been happening. A month ago, I reported that David had met with CNN chairman and C.E.O. Mark Thompson. Shortly thereafter, Paramount executives presided over a video conference in which Mark and his top deputies, who were in Los Angeles, presented Bari, Tom, and others in New York with an overview of their operations. Virginia Moseley, CNN’s executive editor, outlined the network’s newsgathering and editorial processes. Alex MacCallum, the chief operating officer and leading light of the network’s digital transformation, presented the site’s nascent streaming service and subscription strategy. (Guys, whatever you do, hold on to Alex…)"

And even with the recent 60 Minutes oustings, there's some internal discourse due to Ellison and his Skydance lieutenants believing Tom Cibrowski's not good enough to be the business executive running alongside The Free Press founder (the snobbish attitude makes sense due to him being a Silicon Valley trust fund kid):

"By now, you’ve surmised that there are going to be quite a few cooks in this new kitchen. And that’s before factoring in the most critical variable—the impending addition of another executive, as I first reported in May, to assist Bari in her oversight of the two newsrooms.

What David may really be searching for is a bigger version of Cibrowski himself. Tom is the one operational partner who has proven willing to assist Bari’s mission in a beta role. Alas, I’m told the Paramount front office does not believe he has the stature and strategic chops necessary for this broader assignment. That may seem uncharitable given the battle scars he’s already endured in keeping this circus tent from toppling over."


Again, this is not a new thing about Skydance rushing because what Ellison & COO Andy Gordon are doing have been done with Jeff Shell during the Redstone sale. This is what they're known for, even though it's very sloppy to do all of this before anything's official.
 
It's obviously important to survey the components and subsidiaries of the company you're buying so you can be fully certain as to just what exactly you're getting, where you can and cannot cut corners, and how you can integrate that with your existing offerings.
 

Spotlight

Staff online

Who's on Discord?

Latest profile posts

My heart goes out to anyone in Venezuela after yesterday's devastating events…
PinkieLopBun AbodyFan2008 PinkieLopBun wrote on AbodyFan2008's profile.
What's your avatar from? It's cute!
This heat is unbearable.
Going offline until further notice. David Ellison has won. I’m seeking therapy permanently rather than quitting life. Take care everyone. Once I leave the world into the void, I hope my life is better.
Is that Joan Cusack voicing Jessie in that Toy Story Papa John's commercial? If so, it sounds rough. Woundn't surprise me if it wasn't, though.

Featured Posts

Back
Top