I think that is more of troll activity to ruin the Ellison's chance to get WBD.
Like Lowell said if Amazon gets involved, it would ruin Ellison further.
Either way, the plot thickens when it comes to Netflix, could've been Reed Hastings's last act to stick it to the Ellisons as he left the board:
"Meanwhile, you’ve surely seen the “Block the Merger” open letter circulating through Hollywood, signed by more than 3,000 actors, writers, and directors, including Jason Bateman, Joaquin Phoenix, J.J. Abrams, Florence Pugh, Denis Villeneuve, Ben Stiller, Kristen Stewart, and Pedro Pascal. Efforts like this don’t materialize out of thin air, of course—backers here include the Democracy Defenders Fund, the Committee for the First Amendment, and the Future Film Coalition, which are planning a protest outside CBS during the network’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner party.
But I’m also hearing that there’s some suspicion inside Paramount and beyond that Netflix is astroturfing the glitzy campaign as a way to either delay the deal—remember, the Ellisons have to pay WBD shareholders a ticking fee of roughly $650 million per quarter if the closing drags past September 30—or kill it outright.
So is this groundswell as organic as it looks? The Democracy Defenders Fund, run by veteran Washington operative Norm Eisen, strenuously denies that Netflix is meddling backstage—and Netflix also insists it has nothing to do with the letter or protest. That said, I’ve heard Netflix has been quietly shopping for public affairs operatives to help oppose the deal, and has retained economist Nicholas Hill—a former D.O.J. Antitrust Division official who testified for the plaintiffs in the Live Nation trial—to engage with regulators about the Paramount–WBD merger.
I also spoke with a senior government official who told me his staff has fielded multiple complaints in recent weeks from Hill and others connected with Netflix, focused on the transaction and the prospect of attaching licensing conditions. “Frankly, I am surprised at how aggressive they’ve been with me,” he told me. Netflix denies hiring Hill (who didn’t respond to inquiries) and tells me it’s not interfering in the ongoing regulatory review in any way."
It is not up to shareholders nor Ellisons to decide about deal to be fast tracked.
DOJ is one to make a decision about fast tracked, also even if fast tracked, it is not guaranteed and it won't speed up with regulators in other countries.
Hey calm down, Paramount-WBD merger is still under review and it is still very far away from conclusion. Quit listen to Ellison's nonsense.
Again, I said M&A is VERY UNPREDICTABLE and there is no way to know about outcome because any situation can change quickly like if Netflix or Amazon opt to fight, so it will drag further and further. If there is lawsuit to block the M&A.
Ellison's promises are as legit as a certain individual's words that a regional conflict is almost over and that a nation's military is mostly decimated.
Meanwhile, that same regional war that can spiral up unexpected side effects for Skydance's WarnerDiscovery pursuit is still ongoing with escalatory moves always on the table.
I will also say Ellison's very delusional in believing the Free Press founder can conjure up his demographic goal of “70% of Americans” in the center with CNN given the damage she's already done to CBS News, lol:
"On Thursday evening, CBS News chief Bari Weiss will join her boss David Ellison and various other Paramount executives at the Institute of Peace in Washington for an invitation-only dinner honoring President Trump, who settled his infamous lawsuit with the network only about 10 months ago, and her political correspondents.
Two nights later, at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, she will host Trump advisor Stephen Miller and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, two of the administration’s more outspoken media antagonists, as guests at the CBS News tables. Naturally, as ceasefire talks with Iran stall and gas prices rise, this is the talk of the town.
Unsurprisingly, none of this handwringing has fazed David or Bari, both of whom seem to appreciate the strategic imperative of keeping the president in their good graces and are enjoying the light buzz of keeping the Washington gossip circuit in full throttle. David, of course, is on the precipice of acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery, while his father, Larry, just landed majority control of TikTok’s U.S. operations in a sweetheart deal.
Bari, meanwhile, is quite obviously trying to pull CBS News toward an imagined center of the political spectrum, where 70percent of Americans allegedly don’t care whether the president is attending the annual Nerd Prom. The existence of this mythical “70 percent” isn’t exactly borne out by the polling data, but we don’t need to litigate that here. Nor do we need to point out that most of them are already consuming news and media from nontraditional sources who largely scratch this itch—and who have been doing it for so long that the opportunity for Bari probably no longer exists. (Just sayin’…)
Fourth-estate purists have ample reason to bemoan Bari’s plan, but they shouldn’t ignore the strategic rationale, either. In TV news, only Fox has fortress business strategies, and David has enlisted Bari to play for that audience.
In fact, despite her rocky start in the C-suite, I was told this week that he still hopes she can help CNN earn some of that audience after Paramount acquires WBD."