The News Team's "The Overlord" has a new editorial up on the front page of AnimeSuperhero.com:
"I have been in the online animation community for a couple of decades, and I remember in the 2000s it was a common belief that only sympathetic villains were realistic villains associated with mature storytelling, while evil villains were silly and childish.
I think that is not quite correct. The 2000s were not far off from the 80s, where you had villains like Skeletor, Shredder, or Cobra Commander brag about how evil they were. But they did not actually do anything truly evil, and they were not very menacing. That was the type of villain that was being mocked by the 2000s, with characters like Dr. Draken from Kim Possible. But by the 90s and 2000s, we started not only seeing sympathetic villains, but truly evil ones as well.
For every tragic villain like Mr. Freeze from Batman: The Animated Series and Magneto from X-Men: The Animated Series, you have darker rogues, like Joker, a psychopathic nihilist who hurts people for fun or Apocalypse, a monstrous mutant with a god complex who thinks himself superior to other people. With Mr. Freeze or Magneto, the heroes can talk them down, and the conflict can be gray, with the viewer rooting for both hero and villain. But with guys like Joker and Apocalypse? They will never back down, and the viewer is thrilled to see the hero overcome this monstrous threat. Mr. Freeze is sympathetic because his life was destroyed by a corporate tycoon. You are not supposed to sympathize with Ferris Boyle, the architect of Freeze’s misfortune. A sympathetic villain can come off as more sympathetic if contrasted with an evil villain. It was interesting to see Magneto and Apocalypse clash in X-Men: The Animated Series due to their conflicting attitudes and personalities."
Read the full article here.
"Editorial: Sometimes In Animation You Need A Purely Evil Villain"
"I have been in the online animation community for a couple of decades, and I remember in the 2000s it was a common belief that only sympathetic villains were realistic villains associated with mature storytelling, while evil villains were silly and childish.
I think that is not quite correct. The 2000s were not far off from the 80s, where you had villains like Skeletor, Shredder, or Cobra Commander brag about how evil they were. But they did not actually do anything truly evil, and they were not very menacing. That was the type of villain that was being mocked by the 2000s, with characters like Dr. Draken from Kim Possible. But by the 90s and 2000s, we started not only seeing sympathetic villains, but truly evil ones as well.
For every tragic villain like Mr. Freeze from Batman: The Animated Series and Magneto from X-Men: The Animated Series, you have darker rogues, like Joker, a psychopathic nihilist who hurts people for fun or Apocalypse, a monstrous mutant with a god complex who thinks himself superior to other people. With Mr. Freeze or Magneto, the heroes can talk them down, and the conflict can be gray, with the viewer rooting for both hero and villain. But with guys like Joker and Apocalypse? They will never back down, and the viewer is thrilled to see the hero overcome this monstrous threat. Mr. Freeze is sympathetic because his life was destroyed by a corporate tycoon. You are not supposed to sympathize with Ferris Boyle, the architect of Freeze’s misfortune. A sympathetic villain can come off as more sympathetic if contrasted with an evil villain. It was interesting to see Magneto and Apocalypse clash in X-Men: The Animated Series due to their conflicting attitudes and personalities."
Read the full article here.